Skip to main
Spam semi truck

Blocking Analytics Spam

Google Analytics is great for gathering data on who uses your web application, but becomes worthless if spam sessions start infesting your data. Here’s how we’ve tried to combat the problem for

Like many websites, we use Google Analytics to gather data about our users – what OS and browser they used, how they came to our site, etc. But a number of months ago we started seeing lots of this:

Google Analytics spam

It’s not a new problem, but it’s particularly problematic for smaller sites that don’t receive lots of traffic. On a given day, spam hits were accounting for anywhere from ten to ninety (!) percent of our sessions.

Google Analytics total sessions and filtered (non-spam) sessions

There are many solutions out there; since we mostly saw spam in the “referral” field, we wanted a simple way to block spam referrals from being included in our analytics data.

One common approach is to disallow any site visits where document.referrer matches a known spam domain. There are free services that create the necessary Google Analytics “filters” for you, but they must be re-configured frequently as new spammers are added to the list.

Instead, we tried spam-referrals-blocker, which is a script that blocks referrals found on a community-contributed list of referrer spammers. Rather than relying on the owner of the script to update it periodically with the latest disallowed-list – or maintaining our own fork of the repo – we decided to fetch the latest list as part of our build/deploy process, using gulp and gulp-download:

const gulp = require('gulp');
const download = require('gulp-download');

gulp.task('update-spammers', () => {
  const url = '';
  return download(url).pipe(gulp.dest('path/to/js/'));

Once we have an up-to-date disallowed-list, we import it with the webpack raw-loader and block any referrer found on the list:

import spammers from 'raw-loader!./spammers.txt';

window.isSpamReferral = function () {
  const list = spammers.split(' ');
  const currentReferral = document.referrer;
  if (currentReferral) {
    for (const spammer of list) {
      if (spammer && currentReferral.indexOf(spammer) !== -1) {
        return true;
  return false;

And in our HTML, after the JS file has been executed:

  if(!window.isSpamReferral()) {
    // ... initialize Google Analytics

Bonus: Excluding Internal Traffic

Without much extra work, we can also exclude internal traffic from our analytics data:

const devHosts = [
  // List your local development servers

window.isDevelopment = () => devHosts.indexOf( !== -1;

And our modified HTML:

  if(!window.isSpamReferral() && !window.isDevelopment()) {
    // ... initialize Google Analytics

This approach has worked relatively well – in the first two weeks, we only saw nine spam sessions sneak through. But we weren’t entirely thrilled with it, either.

First of all, a disallowed-list of domains-to-block is much more difficult to maintain than an allowed-list of domains-to-allow (even if we’ve off-loaded most of the maintenance to the community). And second, there’s something less-than-ideal about fetching a raw .txt file directly from someone else’s GitHub repo, making assumptions about the format of the file contents, and then relying on it as part of our build/deploy process.

So we’ve recently also implemented some improvements, most notably using an allowed-list filter to exclude any hostnames we haven’t explicitly authorized. This takes care of most of the spam, and is arguably cleaner and easier to maintain.

We haven’t been using this technique for long, but so far the results have been positive. If it continues to work well, we’ll likely remove the referral-blocking code entirely.

If you use Google Analytics, how have you tackled the problem of spam infecting your data? Let us know via Twitter!

Recent Articles

  1. A stand of smartphones
    Article post type

    When to Choose a Native Mobile App

    Part 2 – Responsive Web App vs Native Mobile App vs Progressive Web App

    If you have an idea for a digital product, you may be wondering if you should build a responsive web app, a native mobile app, or a progressive web app. Is one option inherently better? What are the pros and cons? This is part 2 of a three-part series unpacking…

    see all Article posts
  2. spider web with dew drops
    Article post type

    When to Choose a Responsive Web App

    Part 1 – Responsive Web App vs Native Mobile App vs Progressive Web App

    The decision of what platform to use to build your app is quite important – affecting project scope, timeline, and budget. But understanding the differences between a responsive web app, a native mobile app, and a progressive web app – and deciding which one is right for your project …

    see all Article posts
  3. The top front of a bright yellow shipping container with the door open and a blue sky behind it
    Article post type

    Can We Query the Root Container?

    The complexities of containment, overflow, and ‘propagation’

    I spoke about Container Queries at both Smashing Conference (San Francisco) and CSS Day (Amsterdam) – where I recommended setting up a root container to replace most media queries. Since then, Temani Afif pointed out a few issues with that approach, and sent me down a rabbit hole of overlapping…

    see all Article posts